|
Home | Archive
| Winter 2000 | Book reviews
Lifesaver
The art of performance by Heinrich Schenker
Reviewed by Susan Bradshaw
Herbert Esser (ed), Irene Schreier Scott (trans)
Oxford UP (New York & Oxford, 2000); xxvii, 101pp; £35. ISBN 0 19 512254 2
Tantalisingly, this is the book that never was. For
despite the efforts of a whole team of editorial hands, his own
initially included, it remains in essence the monograph which musicologist
Heinrich Schenker first drafted in July 1911 together with
the later addition of material drawn from a boxful of more or less
scrappy aides-mémoire dating from 191432 and
posthumously catalogued (as Fragments and notes) by the
authors widow and his friend and former student, Oswald Jonas.
With the major part of Schenkers estate transferred to New York
for safe keeping in 1938, and with Jonas himself by then living in
the USA, it was he who was deputed to take postwar charge of the job
of deciphering the notes casually scribbled on hundreds of slips
of paper, then, in collaboration with the present editor, to
prepare the manuscript for publication as a kind of a lexicon
a dictionary format then deemed most likely to suit the fragmentary
nature of the material as it stood.
But with no publisher ready to hand, another twenty years were
to pass before Universal Edition showed sufficient interest for
Jonass stepdaughter and heir, Irene Schreier Scott, to propose
herself as translator in conjunction with the conductor Heribert
Esser as editor; it was he who, perhaps wisely, decided to jettison
the earlier idea of a lexicon in favour of a fully integrated text,
leaving himself the recreative freedom to produce a practical,
usable edition which would draw on as much of Schenkers
original wording as possible. Without going into details of omissions/additions
or the innumerable small decisions taken along the way, the result
as presented here can hardly be faulted as a salvage exercise. It
is nonetheless curious that a project begun with such enthusiasm
barely into the second decade of the twentieth century should have
been allowed to lie largely fallow for the last twenty-five years
of its authors life and for many more beyond, until the approach
of a new millennium brought it eventually to posthumous publication.
Motivated at least in part by his admiration for CPE Bachs
On the true art of playing keyboard instruments, it was
the urgent completion of a still larger and more ambitious undertaking,
Free composition, that seems to have taken precedence over The
art of performance as Schenkers life drew to a close
in 1935 although the need for performers to understand compositional
procedures was so central to his thesis that he could well (even
better?) have run the two together as Free composition and
the art of performance. With these indecisions preying on
his mind, it is no surprise to find that he continued to juggle
with ideas that could have found a place in either book.
He begins by urging performers to search for meaning behind the
notational sybols, in order to realise that our great masters
were as inspired in their notation as they were in the actual composing,
hence the need for texts based solely on manuscripts and first editions.
Alas, the music examples given here were chosen not by Schenker
(who included only two notated examples among the many listed references
in his original MS) but, presumably, by the editor; without editorial
explanation, it is difficult to separate instances taken direct
from the Urtext from those culled from Schenkers
own symbolic analyses; it might have been wiser to give them all
in their Ur-state, as well as to ensure their comprehensibility
through a properly professional proofing. In addition to a notable
absence of time signatures (except where examples are taken from
the start of a piece), many of the extracts are so short
often with so much information missing and with so many printing
errors (including at least one totally wrong bar reference)
as to verge on the inscrutable.
Readers with a good knowledge of the (mainly) keyboard repertoire
discussed here should be able to overlook such textual irritations
and to profit by the genuinely good advice with which the book abounds.
Even the transatlantic curiosities of our mutual misunderstandings
give pause for thought sufficient to generate positive mental endeavour:
tone is always a problem, especially when it becomes
the extended tones aiming at individual notes; diminution
too, especially in the plural as the diminutions
until a footnote in Free composition explains that The
term diminution means embellishment in a general broad sense. It
has nothing to do with diminution meaning repetition in smaller
note- values. So thats all right, then.
Words do however tend take on new and often puzzling meanings as
soon as they cross the Atlantic; take proximity, as
in Proximity of the Piano to the Orchestra which, according
to the context, seems to mean how to make the piano sound
like an orchestra. Like the performers arm, which must
be used as a tool in its entire length in such a way that it passes
the instructions of the nerves on to the fingers without interference,
so the book itself must be used as a tool for searching out nuggets
of information: Thus all fortes are no more alike than all
pianos, and rhetorical accents refer to metric organization.
These are things worth remembering in the context of a book that
elsewhere talks almost exclusively about touch at the expense of
motif and phrase, of pressing the keys rather than articulating
pitches. All in all, Schenkers practical advice has the old-fashioned
ring of his English contemporary, Tobias Matthay, with its gliding
elbows and elastic, swaying motion of arm and
hand including the injunction (placed here by way of conclusion)
to each and every pianist to employ the greatest variety of
hand and arm motions and the most manifold gradations,
in order to infuse the tones with genuine life. In other
words, its necessarily a bit of a hotch-potch.
Susan Bradshaw is a pianist and writer
|